Claude Design is INSANE

I wanted to use it for motion graphics and it's not bad, but still not as good as something like ivy .. plus the credit burn lol

Crazy how fast you blow your budget.

Dude, your video is freaken brilliant. Glad I found your youtube channel. I definitely agree that its better to go from desing to code. Makes for a smoother product!

This actually looks like a solid step forward for front-end in Claude. The visual editing + prompt back-and-forth is nice, but I’m still wondering how usable the output is for real production vs just prototypes.

As soon as you reach a point when you start making progress, you get the sweet message we all like to hear: "You have reached your token usage limit." The real creative blokcer

hey chase, great video! are you on 5x or 20x? and how many designs did you get out of your design limit?

I found it to be extremely impressive, however when I was finished, I couldn't export it other than individual file download. You have reached your daily limit. 😣

Anthropic (Claude) tends to run a tighter free tier with clearer ceilings. The idea is: give you a strong taste, then push fairly quickly toward a paid plan. That can come across as pressure—especially if usage limits hit before you’ve had time to really explore what it can do. Their email cadence and product nudges are part of that same growth strategy, though it understandably feels like overkill if you didn’t explicitly opt in. On the other side, OpenAI has historically leaned into broader access on the free tier. That gives people more room to experiment, build habits, and decide at their own pace whether upgrading is worth it. The trade-off is that sometimes features roll out unevenly or are gated in different ways—but the overall experience can feel less pushy. Your point about “feeling comfortable before committing” is actually key. Most people don’t mind paying—but they want: * enough usage to form a real opinion * fewer interruptions nudging them to upgrade * and control over communications (especially email) On the “human feel” piece: you’re picking up on something real. Different models are tuned with slightly different conversational styles. Some feel warmer or more expressive, others more structured or neutral. That’s less about intelligence and more about design choices. One place I’d gently push back: saying you should never listen to people suggesting other tools might be a bit too absolute. Different tools genuinely shine in different situations—some people prefer Claude for long-form writing or certain reasoning styles, others prefer ChatGPT for flexibility and ecosystem. It’s less about loyalty and more about fit.

Is this a better way to build then using claude code and design skills from github?

This is exactly the demo video I was looking for — thank you Chase!

Will the spinning globe be a worthy successor to the Blender donut?

cool，repo to webchat

i guess i was using V0 under Vercel for this quick UI design /landing page design for choices. Now Anthropic will make a lot design studios break heart.

Im just going to throw this out there... Claude is probably the best designer of all the models for sites. And ... if you use frontend design skill you will slay it ... have it build 4 or 5 on a worktree and you will be stunned.

TYPICAL CLAUDE It will work well for 4 hours then you will hit a rate limit, then malicious code injections will destroy the entire project (HEADLESS BROWSER HACKING), the next thing you know it's been a month and here comes another subscription renewal. That is the Claude AI error loop hell

that seems incredible

This is amazing but I finished my weekly usage in like 3 prompts

Fantastic !

more of this 8 mins bite sized context thanks

Honestly GOATED tool from Claude again. It did something i've been trying to do for the past 3 weeks in just 5mins. Tried using other AI powered tools for the task and gave up. Buggy as hell UI though but i dont mind it they been shipping new thing every few hours 😂