betul thailand juga ada pemain hebat tapi mereka tidak boleh menerima tekanan . malaysia & negara lain pun pernah menerima situasi yang sama sebelum ini apabila reff tidak membuat keputusan yang kita rasa tak betul . tapi thailand seperti anak manja dalam sukan ini 😁
R
rosaaltamirano4673 weeks, 4 days ago
best way is a camera top angle above net and like VAR to avoid controversy.
K
kimberlyechoing263 weeks, 4 days ago
If they always are not clearly and fair in referee system, Sepak takraw will never cross over Local/Asian sport to global sport although next 100 years.
revadawn743 weeks, 4 days ago
Kenapa xnk teruskan main? Even kalau thailand menang pada set ke2… diteruskan dgn set ke3 kan? So, kenapa nak menyerah? Set ke3 penentunya, kalau teruskan mungkin tak terjadi perdebatan.
michael.campbell3 weeks, 4 days ago
Aku baca komen2 netizen Thailand kat channel Thai,depa kata pengadil tu tak dibenarkan jadi pengadil kat Liga Thailand sebab keputusan kontroversi dia.Tapi aku rasa alasan depa je tu.Kalau Anak jantan buat apa protest sampai tak nak main.Aku rasa kalau depa yang menang set pertama scrip mungkin lain.
There was clearly a misunderstanding during the match. Thailand interpreted the decision one way, while the referees communicated it differently. 1. The main referee stated that a foot fault itself could not be challenged. Only three situations were reviewable: net touch, tekong position, and line calls. 2. The confusion started when the lower referee called both teams for a challenge review, even though the main referee had already said that a foot fault was not reviewable. 3. The challenge review still proceeded, but it was not to review the foot fault. Instead, it was a review for a possible net fault. That is why the referee gave the “NOT OVER” signal. 4. However, the original decision remained a foot fault by Thailand before the net review took place, so the point was correctly awarded to Malaysia. 5. Thailand then misunderstood the “NOT OVER” signal and assumed the point should go to them, even though the actual fault was the foot overstep, not the net issue. 6. In conclusion, according to the rules, the referees ultimately made the correct decision.
Thailand nak nagis
The World Sepak Takraw Association should not allow one person and Malaysian sepak takraw to damage the world of sepak takraw.
Kenapa sobey asyik loading aje 😂😂😂
Malaysia pernah kena dekat asian games 2018...terima jer keputusan,siap menang lg...masih 14-14...bleh lg nk menang...
foul is foul rules is rules Referee should call it nobody noticed doesn't mean it's right
🎉🇲🇾🇲🇾🎉
Si Syahir tu mcm paham jer
Kebiasaan kalau wasit dia malaysia selalu di untungkan
rasanya kalu keputusan ini favour ke thais, msian team tak mcm ni, kerana mereka ada high sporting spirit
2nd referee must be investigated and interrogated.. the foul is very clear yet he raised 'not over'
Village-level rules, but the dream is to be included in the Olympics.
มาตรฐานการตัดสิน ส่งผลให้เห็นช่องโหว่ของการใช้ดุลพินิจของกรรมการผู้ควบคุมการแข่งขัน ยังมีผลต่อการแข่งขันมากเกินไป ทำให้เข้าใจเพิ่มขึ้นว่าทำไมกีฬาชนิดนี้จึงยากที่จะเข้าสู่โอลิมปิก ที่เป็นกีฬาสากล
ทำไมทางเจ้าภาพไม่มีมุมกล้องด้านหัวเน็ตเหมือนกีฬาวอลเลย์บอล จะเห็นมุมต่างๆได้ชัด
betul thailand juga ada pemain hebat tapi mereka tidak boleh menerima tekanan . malaysia & negara lain pun pernah menerima situasi yang sama sebelum ini apabila reff tidak membuat keputusan yang kita rasa tak betul . tapi thailand seperti anak manja dalam sukan ini 😁
best way is a camera top angle above net and like VAR to avoid controversy.
If they always are not clearly and fair in referee system, Sepak takraw will never cross over Local/Asian sport to global sport although next 100 years.
Kenapa xnk teruskan main? Even kalau thailand menang pada set ke2… diteruskan dgn set ke3 kan? So, kenapa nak menyerah? Set ke3 penentunya, kalau teruskan mungkin tak terjadi perdebatan.
Aku baca komen2 netizen Thailand kat channel Thai,depa kata pengadil tu tak dibenarkan jadi pengadil kat Liga Thailand sebab keputusan kontroversi dia.Tapi aku rasa alasan depa je tu.Kalau Anak jantan buat apa protest sampai tak nak main.Aku rasa kalau depa yang menang set pertama scrip mungkin lain.
ถ้านี่เป็นทีมมาเลนะ ก็ไม่ได้รู้สึกยินดีเลยที่ได้ชัยชนะแบบนี้ ทำไมถึงกล้าภูมิใจในสิ่งที่ไม่ถูกต้องกันนะ ให้มองการแข่งแบบนี้แบบไม่เข้าข้างฝั่งไหนเลย กรรมการไอ้ราดี้ห่าเหวนี่ลำเอียงหลายรอบแล้ว ถ้าอยากจะชนะโดยไม่สนความยุติธรรมอะไรเลย การแข่งขันนี้ไม่ควรให้มีด้วยซ้ำ เพราะไม่ได้อยู่บนพื้นฐานความถูกต้องและเป็นกลางของทีมผู้ตัดสิน
There was clearly a misunderstanding during the match. Thailand interpreted the decision one way, while the referees communicated it differently. 1. The main referee stated that a foot fault itself could not be challenged. Only three situations were reviewable: net touch, tekong position, and line calls. 2. The confusion started when the lower referee called both teams for a challenge review, even though the main referee had already said that a foot fault was not reviewable. 3. The challenge review still proceeded, but it was not to review the foot fault. Instead, it was a review for a possible net fault. That is why the referee gave the “NOT OVER” signal. 4. However, the original decision remained a foot fault by Thailand before the net review took place, so the point was correctly awarded to Malaysia. 5. Thailand then misunderstood the “NOT OVER” signal and assumed the point should go to them, even though the actual fault was the foot overstep, not the net issue. 6. In conclusion, according to the rules, the referees ultimately made the correct decision.