In Weapons, when all but one child from the same class mysteriously vanish on the same night at exactly the same time, a community is left questioning who or what is behind their disappearance. We're breaking down the story's twists and turns, including what happened to the kids and explaining the shocking ending. Subscribe! ►► http://bit.ly/2jrstgM= Support FoundFlix on Patreon! ►► http://www.patreon.com/foundflix FACEBOOK ►► www.facebook.com/foundflix TWITTER ►► www.twitter.com/foundflix INSTAGRAM ►► www.instagram.com/foundflix FAN MAIL: FoundFlix 6009 W Parker Rd Suite 149-174 Plano TX 75093
ADVERTISEMENT
Finally. Gonna need you to bump up the schedule bro. What am I supposed to do, watch these movies myself? SMH.
The story essentially being the classic woman in the community being accused of being a witch who steals children and gets ostracized trope , while an actual witch stole the children was good writing to me.
My biggest pet peeve about weapons is the detectives didn’t think it was fishy. The father had a stroke and the grandmother was speaking for him
Would have been hilarious if he did the weird run past the screen for the intro
Did anyone else laugh so hard at the end when the kids chased that witch through the neighborhood then tear her apart?
Not all of y'all can be first bro
One of my favorite details in this movie is the subtle changes between each persons point of view on the events of what happened like how after Paul punches James in the face when he's saying that he can go as long as he doesn't see him again if you pay attention when it's told from Paul's perspective he is almost kind and he is trying to be nice because he messed up but when that same part is told from James perspective Paul is mean and is very forceful when he says "don't let me see your face around here again"... Or like when Paul and Justine meet at the bar from her perspective when Paul walks in and sees her and they walk over to greet one another and they get pretty close together making it feel like Paul is happy to see her but from his perspective when he walks in and waves it's a pitiful and his smile is more of a nervous grin plus there is more distance between the two when she walks over making him feel more uncomfortable and closed off since he knows what he's doing is wrong but he gives in anyways. There are other little differences like that but these are just two of my favorites.
Honestly I just wanted the gun in the sky explained but the director himself said it meant nothing
It seems like the whole doorbell cameras thing should’ve blown the case wide open a lot sooner. All the kids ran in a straight line, not following the road, so I feel like a detective should’ve figured out to investigate where those lines converged long before a random construction worker.
Bloody wide eyed Marcus is probably some of the creepiest horror movie imagery I’ve seen in years.. It’s just such an unnerving and uncanny look, the makeup team did an amazing job thats for sure 💀
Rest in peace Trevor Moore. At least Zach was able to channel his grief into this project.
17:46 bro I used to walk to the gas station in 2020-2021 from my apartment right down the road. That’s kinda wild to see my home town in a movie on here lol
I assumed she was just mortal. she didn't have a real long term plan, she just didn't want to die and was willing to sacrifice the futures of children
Don’t feel pressured to upload if youre feeling unwell, feeling burnt out or having other things going on. Been here for a while and I appreciate you. I’m going to stick around
The Justin Long cameo was unexpected and very much welcomed. Forever our Scream King
The Snipping of the hair was the creepiest part for me. So subtle yet effective
I agree with the film theory that Gladys is likely not really related to Alex & his family. Alex's parents stated that they haven't seen her in 15 years & that she is the sister of Alex's maternal grandmother. Gladys tells principal Marcus that Alex's mom is her baby sister. Then she tells Alex that she hasn't seen him since he was a baby. Too many inconsistencies. I also agree with the film theory that Gladys might be much older than what she presents herself to be. The fact that she used the term "consumption" instead of "tuberculosis" implies that she's been around since the 1800s
I just thought of a possible plot hole, if they were captured on some of the parents ring cameras and some of the kids were running on the road why didn’t other possible houses also check to see which way the kids went so they could’ve been found sooner? If that makes sense
I thought I was experiencing déjà vu
Biggest issue with this is that not nearly enough people were suspicious of the singular survivor of the classroom or disappeared kids. Alex would have been suspect #1 or at the very least the biggest clue. figuring out why HE was the only one left would help solve the case.