Check out the Armor All Podium Series for podium-worthy car cleaning at home: https://www.amazon.com/stores/ArmorAll/page/B37A858A-BC80-44EF-A864-15C280FB7511?lp_asin=B0DK454VS4&ref_=ast_bln&store_ref=bl_ast_dp_brandlogo_sto&bl_grd_status=override When Red Bull’s heavily upgraded F1 car made its on-track debut at the Miami Grand Prix, one extreme development looked as though it must have been copied from another team. But that wasn’t the case. 00:00 Red Bull’s new rear wing 00:56 Public and private approaches 02:44 Why these designs are possible 04:50 Whose solution is more effective? Subscribe: http://the-race.com/youtube_subscribe The Race Members' Club: https://www.patreon.com/cw/TheRace/membership Website: http://the-race.com/ Twitter: @wearetherace Instagram: @wearetherace Facebook: http://facebook.com/wearetherace Podcasts: http://the-race.com/podcasts #f1 #formula1 #formulaone #grandprix #f12026 #f1news #f1tech #therace #redbull #redbullracing #redbullf1 #ferrari #ferrarif1 #armorall #fia
ADVERTISEMENT
So what you're telling me is... Red bull gives you wings?
What in the fuck with these loud ambush ads like the guy hasn’t finished his sentence and this shit comes on very loud
Nothing will beat Kimi's masive rear wing deployment in Germany 2004
Here's a fucking idea. Blend your midroll ad into your script. I will consider clicking when you do your ad spots properly.
That opening on the RB wing was absolutely massive 😅.
Great to see some creative tech in F1,
I think they did a better job at it than ferarri did. More effecient with it having less travel distance. At the same time being more extreme when open. The wing is in travel for less time so there has to be less disturbance as far as aero goes.
I’m surprised nobody has went down the Alpine route
Sponsorblock is good to have.
The Ferrari wing rotates through a larger (and more aerodynamically unstable) arc than the RB wing. In addition, the arc it rotates through will cause much more of a 'bump' in rear grip (less stable under braking) than the RB solution as the Ferrari wing rotates through regimes of flow reversal the RB solution doesn't. (RB maintains a concave surface facing the wind, where the Ferrari presents concave -> convex {with load of parasitic and highly unstable drag} -> concave). I believe it was Jack Northrop (though I'm usually wrong about these things) who once said "It's nice to be first, but the money comes from being second." 🖖😎👍
What's so amazing is it's how Ferrari should have made their wing
So when Ferrari does it some people ridiculed it. When RB does it its called bold and innovative. Explain?
Seems quicker to deploy and reattach than the ferrari's. And thus seems more stable too.
The thing is. In typical Ferrari fashion. Their method looks cool, but it’s engineered wrong and the element flips backwards and gives a brief moment of “lift” when it’s being deployed which is exactly what you don’t want. RedBull on the other hand goes the right direction. It’s not as cool, but it looks MUCH more effective.
More important than the size (height) of Red Bull’s gap underneath the open wing being larger than Ferraris’s, may be that the Ferrari wing element remains between the wing endplates while RB’s lifts the wing above the endplates, allowing the airflow to be entirely free. Yes/no?
They're all gonna have a flippy rear wing by the end of the season, it's clearly the better design.
"Flip-flop" wing is crazy, just call it a rotating wing, why won't people just call it a rotating wing lol
Wont be buying armorall anymore, i get enough advertisements in my life.
Hey Macarena 🕺
It's 24Hr Endurance race next weekend.