Watch Fox League. Sign up for a FREE TRIAL now π https://kayosports.app.link/g5C9NNMac7 Subscribe and π to Fox League YouTube π https://bit.ly/2TzhZQW FOLLOW US ON SOCIAL Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/foxnrl Twitter: https://twitter.com/FOXNRL Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/foxleague/
ADVERTISEMENT
Same thing happened to Warbrick for the storm last week.. funny that the ref said the exact opposite when it's the storm..
every game i see ten play the balls where the player never even tries to play the ball with his foot just rolls it back with his hand
Knock on
By definition he loses control of it. It's in his hand and he doesn't want it to be.
They need to bring back raking from the marker - that would stop players playing the ball like like under 8βs
to spray or not to spray, that is the question...
Can we do that with tries too
Love that from the ref tbf!
That's a fair call actually by geeπ. I like gee he's a good man and a good refπ. That 2023 gf was his best refereeing performance π
Next thing you know it wasnt a forward pass it was just that spray they use that made it happen
He actually never loses control of it ? π€‘π©ππΎ
A knock on is a knock on, regardless of sticky handsβ¦Iβve seen that happen before and it was penalised, for the ref to say he doesnβt lose control of it basically disqualifies him from refereeingβ¦even if you donβt think itβs a knock on, heβs still lost control in the play the ball
By definition Curran last week grazed his boot... But to the letter of the law they say no try. Letter of the law here he loses it. Depends who the ref and NRL wants week to week.
There was a penalty given against Tallis Duncan for high contact even though the player literally slipped into him and the ref apologised and explained that he understood there was nothing Tallis could do but it had to be a penalty because thatβs the rule. Whereβs the consistency with this? It led directly to a try and itβs literally been ruled a knock on in every other instance that itβs happened leading up to this game
Nothing wrong with it stol nit picking at least he touched it with his foot
I really think the game would benefit from relaxing the interpretations. To me that is fine, thereβs no clear forward movement so play on.
Fair call
I got no problem with that at all
there was a penalty for a high and the slow motion replay showed zero contact with the head
So if itβs raining and I lose the ball because itβs wet, I didnβt actually drop the ball, it was the waterβs fault for being slippery? Gee wizβ¦